For some odd reason in conflict with my Gen X self, I feel very protective of Gen Y. The way we slice and dice their motivation across very decided lines doesn’t do them justice, or even us as brand planners.
The highly criticized paper by Danah Boyd makes some sweeping statements about Gen Y that does not look at the underpinnings of their decisions.
We talk with more Gen Y influencers across all ethnicities than socially acceptable for 40-yr-olds (like 3am MySpace conversations with high school students on Friday nights. Their parents are well aware.) These MySpacers are not freaks. They’re intense about everything they do—the same person who Cosplays on Saturday shows up for her Model Congress debate on Monday.
They’re not spending their time collecting countless friends—that is for freaks.
They use their social networking for what it does for them. To date, nothing exists that meets all their needs. So they jump around using MySpace for one thing and Facebook for another, plus a myriad of niche networks and invite-only networks. It hasn’t been a trade off of one for the other. The point where they add Facebook is when they need to network with college people. Picture them sitting in front of a control station for command central and that’s where we’re at.
We’ve got to move beyond talking to the masses…haven’t we learned that yet? Being dragged down by the least common denominator helps no one. If we continue to look at the majority, we’ll get the watered down version of what’s really happening. Doing it that way only let’s you watch the followers. It doesn’t let you look forward. Kinda like sitting on the railroad car facing backward. Sometimes, I like that—when I’m feeling reflective. Drives me insane when I need to get in step with things.
Recent Comments